The daily life of childhood and adolescence has become progressively and inextricably linked to digital technology. Screens are pervasive, mediating communication, entertainment, and, increasingly, education.1,2 This marks a significant divergence from previous generations for whom paper served as the primary medium for learning and information consumption. Although the digital realm undeniably offers unprecedented opportunities, such as easy access to vast amounts of information, data, and cultural resources, potentially enhancing cognitive skills and bridging geographical distances, a profound ongoing concern exists regarding how the digital reading medium may affect learning in children and adolescents.3 Concerns persist regarding the impact of the digital shift on fundamental learning processes when compared with traditional paper-based methods.1,4 Both the potential benefits and the significant risks associated with immersion in digital technology, such as dependence, isolation from the real world, and detrimental effects on study time and physical activity (Table), have been variously acknowledged in recent years.This commentary, developed by members of the Working Group on Social Pediatrics of the European Pediatric Association, Union of National European Pediatric Societies and Associations (EPA-UNEPSA), focuses on the use of printed material and digital devices in the learning process and the implications for cognitive functions, such as reading comprehension, attention, and memory in children and adolescents. Our aim is to provide a brief overview of the cognitive, pedagogical, and social implications of both media, while also considering individual preferences and exploring the potential for both forms of learning to coexist within a balanced approach that bridges tradition and innovation.

Paper versus Screen: The Unresolved Conflict in Children's and Adolescents' Learning Processes

Pettoello-Mantovani M.
Conceptualization
;
Giardino I.
Conceptualization
;
2025-01-01

Abstract

The daily life of childhood and adolescence has become progressively and inextricably linked to digital technology. Screens are pervasive, mediating communication, entertainment, and, increasingly, education.1,2 This marks a significant divergence from previous generations for whom paper served as the primary medium for learning and information consumption. Although the digital realm undeniably offers unprecedented opportunities, such as easy access to vast amounts of information, data, and cultural resources, potentially enhancing cognitive skills and bridging geographical distances, a profound ongoing concern exists regarding how the digital reading medium may affect learning in children and adolescents.3 Concerns persist regarding the impact of the digital shift on fundamental learning processes when compared with traditional paper-based methods.1,4 Both the potential benefits and the significant risks associated with immersion in digital technology, such as dependence, isolation from the real world, and detrimental effects on study time and physical activity (Table), have been variously acknowledged in recent years.This commentary, developed by members of the Working Group on Social Pediatrics of the European Pediatric Association, Union of National European Pediatric Societies and Associations (EPA-UNEPSA), focuses on the use of printed material and digital devices in the learning process and the implications for cognitive functions, such as reading comprehension, attention, and memory in children and adolescents. Our aim is to provide a brief overview of the cognitive, pedagogical, and social implications of both media, while also considering individual preferences and exploring the potential for both forms of learning to coexist within a balanced approach that bridges tradition and innovation.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11369/484900
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact