Deleuze for psychoanalysis: Repetition and difference

The aim of this article is part of research by contemporary modes of subjectivities, in particular regarding polemics between Gilles Deleuze`s philosophy and psychoanalysis. Deleuze accepts the discovery of the unconscious mental processes, assuming a position about the image of psychoanalytic thinking, in particular as regards thinking repetition as repetition subjugated to the representation (identity). We find that Deleuze is looking Freud as becoming dialectical, in the background, a controversy with Hegel. We seem to put this controversy is essential to understand in what sense Deleuze is an event for psychoanalysis. The canonical readings of Freud and Lacan have been useful, but have also had the effect of hegemonize research and, with this, going to exhaust the possibilities that psychoanalytic thinking is authorized to consider as their own. That is why we propose a reading that, taking Deleuze passes from Freud to Donald Winnicott, realizing an unprecedented meeting to think the "limit" of temporality and thus the subjectivity. Winnicott showed ambivalent interest in theoretical metapsychology, but researching through illusion nature, repetition and difference showed new kinds of possibilities.