In this work, two different extraction procedures for the analysis of different polycyclic aromatic hydro-carbons (PAHs) in water by microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) have been compared in terms of sensitivity, reliability and time of analysis. The first method, called “draw-eject”, consists of cycle sequences of aspirations and injections in the same vial; the second one, called “extractdiscard”, consists of a similar cycle sequence, but in this case the aspired sample is discarded into waste. The relevant partition equilibriums and extraction rates have been calculated by multivariate regression from the data obtained after MEPS gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (MEPS-GC–MS) analysis of 16 PAHs from water samples. Partitioning parameters for a priori prediction of solute sorption equilibrium, recoveries and preconcentration effects in aqueous and solvent systems have been calculated and compared for the two extraction procedures. Finally, real samples from sea, agricultural irrigation wells, streams and tap water have been analyzed. Detection (S/N ≥ 3) and quantification (S/N ≥ 10) limits were calculated for the extraction processes. Under the experimental conditions used for the “draw-eject” procedure, these values were in the range 0.5–2 ng L−1and 1.6–6.2 ng L−1, while for the “extract-discard” procedure they ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 ng L−1and from 0.8 to 2.0 ng L−1, respectively.

MICROEXTRACTION BY PACKED SORBENT COUPLED WITH GASCHROMATOGRAPHY – MASS SPECTROMETRY: A HYPHENATED TECHNIQUE FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS DETERMINATION IN WATER.

QUINTO, MAURIZIO;CENTONZE, DIEGO;PALERMO, CARMEN;NARDIELLO, DONATELLA;SPADACCINO, GIUSEPPINA;
2015-01-01

Abstract

In this work, two different extraction procedures for the analysis of different polycyclic aromatic hydro-carbons (PAHs) in water by microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) have been compared in terms of sensitivity, reliability and time of analysis. The first method, called “draw-eject”, consists of cycle sequences of aspirations and injections in the same vial; the second one, called “extractdiscard”, consists of a similar cycle sequence, but in this case the aspired sample is discarded into waste. The relevant partition equilibriums and extraction rates have been calculated by multivariate regression from the data obtained after MEPS gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (MEPS-GC–MS) analysis of 16 PAHs from water samples. Partitioning parameters for a priori prediction of solute sorption equilibrium, recoveries and preconcentration effects in aqueous and solvent systems have been calculated and compared for the two extraction procedures. Finally, real samples from sea, agricultural irrigation wells, streams and tap water have been analyzed. Detection (S/N ≥ 3) and quantification (S/N ≥ 10) limits were calculated for the extraction processes. Under the experimental conditions used for the “draw-eject” procedure, these values were in the range 0.5–2 ng L−1and 1.6–6.2 ng L−1, while for the “extract-discard” procedure they ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 ng L−1and from 0.8 to 2.0 ng L−1, respectively.
2015
978-88-907670-2-9
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11369/330224
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact