Background: Social media platforms like Instagram have become major sources of health information, often amplifying unverified claims. Nocturnal mouth-taping is one such trend promoted as beneficial for sleep and overall health despite limited scientific evidence. Methods: In April 2025, 530 Instagram reels tagged #mouthtape were retrieved via the official API. After exclusions, 390 reels were analyzed. Two independent reviewers assessed each reel for relevance, stance on mouth-taping, presenter characteristics, engagement metrics, and content type. Spearman’s correlation, Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, and Chi-Square tests were applied. Results: Overall, 94.4% of reels endorsed mouth-taping. Most content was produced by companies (55.4%), while only 11.6% was posted by medical professionals. Supportive posts had significantly higher shares than critical ones (mean 923 vs. 193; p = 0.015). Male presenters’ reels achieved more likes and shares, though female presenters had more followers. English-language posts generated greater engagement. Commercial and medical claims predominated, with limited representation of evidence-based information. Conclusions: Instagram content overwhelmingly promotes mouth-taping, largely driven by commercial actors. High engagement with supportive posts, regardless of scientific validity, underscores the role of algorithms in spreading non-evidence-based health claims.

The Spread of Non-Evidence-Based Health Claims on Social Media: The Case of #Mouthtape on Instagram, a Cross-Sectional Study

Bizzoca, Maria Eleonora;Musella, Gennaro;Lo Muzio, Lorenzo;Trecca, Eleonora;Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background: Social media platforms like Instagram have become major sources of health information, often amplifying unverified claims. Nocturnal mouth-taping is one such trend promoted as beneficial for sleep and overall health despite limited scientific evidence. Methods: In April 2025, 530 Instagram reels tagged #mouthtape were retrieved via the official API. After exclusions, 390 reels were analyzed. Two independent reviewers assessed each reel for relevance, stance on mouth-taping, presenter characteristics, engagement metrics, and content type. Spearman’s correlation, Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, and Chi-Square tests were applied. Results: Overall, 94.4% of reels endorsed mouth-taping. Most content was produced by companies (55.4%), while only 11.6% was posted by medical professionals. Supportive posts had significantly higher shares than critical ones (mean 923 vs. 193; p = 0.015). Male presenters’ reels achieved more likes and shares, though female presenters had more followers. English-language posts generated greater engagement. Commercial and medical claims predominated, with limited representation of evidence-based information. Conclusions: Instagram content overwhelmingly promotes mouth-taping, largely driven by commercial actors. High engagement with supportive posts, regardless of scientific validity, underscores the role of algorithms in spreading non-evidence-based health claims.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11369/485432
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact