This study examines household food-waste sorting behavior in Lithuania, with a particular focus on the determinants shaping residents’ attitudes and practices. A survey of 264 respondents was conducted in two regions–Alytus, where source-separated food-waste collection has been in place since 2018, and Telšiai, where such a system has not yet been implemented. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests (Chi-square and Kruskal–Wallis). The results indicate that food-waste sorting behavior is strongly conditioned by infrastructural availability, housing type, income level, and household size. Although 85.6% of respondents express support for food-waste separation, only 29.9% report perceiving direct benefits from doing so. The primary barriers identified include perceived additional costs, increased time requirements, and issues related to odor. Financial instruments–particularly “pay-as-you-throw” schemes–together with targeted informational campaigns emerge as the most promising approaches for encouraging higher participation rates. Overall, the findings provide empirically grounded recommendations for improving waste-management infrastructure, promoting household composting, and designing economic and informational interventions aimed at enhancing sustainable waste practices and reducing environmental impacts.

From kitchen to bin: exploring household food waste sorting in Lithuania

Fiore, Mariantonietta
Data Curation
2026-01-01

Abstract

This study examines household food-waste sorting behavior in Lithuania, with a particular focus on the determinants shaping residents’ attitudes and practices. A survey of 264 respondents was conducted in two regions–Alytus, where source-separated food-waste collection has been in place since 2018, and Telšiai, where such a system has not yet been implemented. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests (Chi-square and Kruskal–Wallis). The results indicate that food-waste sorting behavior is strongly conditioned by infrastructural availability, housing type, income level, and household size. Although 85.6% of respondents express support for food-waste separation, only 29.9% report perceiving direct benefits from doing so. The primary barriers identified include perceived additional costs, increased time requirements, and issues related to odor. Financial instruments–particularly “pay-as-you-throw” schemes–together with targeted informational campaigns emerge as the most promising approaches for encouraging higher participation rates. Overall, the findings provide empirically grounded recommendations for improving waste-management infrastructure, promoting household composting, and designing economic and informational interventions aimed at enhancing sustainable waste practices and reducing environmental impacts.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11369/484072
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact