Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
IRIS
Purpose: To investigate the association between dynamic driving pressure (ΔPdyn) and mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with acute brain injury (ABI), and to evaluate whether neurological and pulmonary injury severity modify this relationship. Methods: This prespecified secondary analysis of the VENTIBRAIN prospective study (NCT04459884) included mechanically ventilated adult patients with ABI (traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke). ΔPdyn was calculated daily over the first 14 days as peak inspiratory pressure minus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Bayesian joint models evaluated the time-varying association between ΔPdyn and mortality at ICU discharge, hospital discharge, and 6 months. Secondary analyses evaluated effect modification by baseline Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), PaO₂/FiO₂, and ABI subtype. Results: Among 1,555 patients (median age 59 years, 34.5% female), higher time-varying ΔPdyn was associated with increased ICU mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.057 per daily 1cmH2O; 95% credible interval, 1.037–1.078; posterior probability of HR > 1, 99.9%). Findings were consistent across all ABI subtypes and were similar for static ΔP (plateau pressure minus PEEP). The association was strongest in patients with severe ABI (GCS ≤ 8) and severe hypoxemia (PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤ 100). Results were robust across all outcome timepoints and multiple sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Higher time-varying ΔPdyn was associated with increased mortality in this cohort of patients with ABI. Neurological injury severity independently modified the harm from ΔPdyn with a magnitude comparable to severe hypoxemia. Measurement of ΔPdyn may aid risk stratification and ventilation strategies in ABI; future trials should evaluate the effect of reducing ΔPdyn in this population.
Dynamic driving pressure and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with acute brain injury: a secondary analysis of the VENTIBRAIN study*
Purpose: To investigate the association between dynamic driving pressure (ΔPdyn) and mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with acute brain injury (ABI), and to evaluate whether neurological and pulmonary injury severity modify this relationship. Methods: This prespecified secondary analysis of the VENTIBRAIN prospective study (NCT04459884) included mechanically ventilated adult patients with ABI (traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke). ΔPdyn was calculated daily over the first 14 days as peak inspiratory pressure minus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Bayesian joint models evaluated the time-varying association between ΔPdyn and mortality at ICU discharge, hospital discharge, and 6 months. Secondary analyses evaluated effect modification by baseline Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), PaO₂/FiO₂, and ABI subtype. Results: Among 1,555 patients (median age 59 years, 34.5% female), higher time-varying ΔPdyn was associated with increased ICU mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.057 per daily 1cmH2O; 95% credible interval, 1.037–1.078; posterior probability of HR > 1, 99.9%). Findings were consistent across all ABI subtypes and were similar for static ΔP (plateau pressure minus PEEP). The association was strongest in patients with severe ABI (GCS ≤ 8) and severe hypoxemia (PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤ 100). Results were robust across all outcome timepoints and multiple sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Higher time-varying ΔPdyn was associated with increased mortality in this cohort of patients with ABI. Neurological injury severity independently modified the harm from ΔPdyn with a magnitude comparable to severe hypoxemia. Measurement of ΔPdyn may aid risk stratification and ventilation strategies in ABI; future trials should evaluate the effect of reducing ΔPdyn in this population.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11369/479011
Citazioni
1
3
3
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.