This contribution aims to trace, by a critical perspective, the historical evolution of the ways and forms in which the ‘solo’ and the ‘chorus’ have been expressed in theatre (both spoken and musical), dance, and performance from the 20th century to today. The historical discussion, organized here by themes and fields, highlights the particular dialectic triggered in some experimental periods by these two “luoghi-strumenti”, as Marco De Marinis aptly defines them, which have come to characterize specific theatrical genres, trends in both modern and contemporary theatre, as well as artistic, social, and community practices. Since the origins of Western theatre and dramaturgy, different logics have governed the relationship between chorus and solo, leading up to more radical contemporary reconsiderations, such as the removal of the chorus in the Attic tragedy directed by Socìetas Raffaello Sanzio, or its paroxysmal amplification in the form of a mass on the scene of Einar Schleef. In the dialectic between these two elements, we can discern a condition of confrontation or dialogue, of contrast or synthesis within a community, between the individual and society. It is precisely in the overcoming of the modern conflict between solo and chorus that we recognize the essence of contemporary theatre: when the ‘I’ no longer represents just an unrepeatable singularity but can become unison in close interaction with other choristers. As in the choral practices of Marco Martinelli and of much ‘community theatre’, the individual’s voice becomes the voice of all, blending into a collective whole, the political ‘we’ of a citizenship in search of action.
Il presente contributo si propone di tracciare, secondo una prospettiva critica, l’evoluzione storica dei modi e delle forme in cui il ‘solo’ e il ‘coro’ si sono espressi nel teatro (di parola e in musica), nella danza e nella performance dal Novecento ad oggi. Il discorso storico, riorganizzato qui per temi e ambiti, mette in luce la particolare dialettica innescata in alcune stagioni sperimentali da questi due “luoghi-strumenti”, come ben li definisce Marco De Marinis, arrivando a caratterizzare specifici generi teatrali, tendenze della scena, sia moderna che contemporanea, e pratiche artistiche, sociali e di comunità. Differenti le logiche che ordinano il rapporto coro/solo fin dalle origini del teatro e della drammaturgia occidentali, per arrivare ai più radicali ripensamenti contemporanei con l’amputazione del coro tragico negli allestimenti della Socìetas Raffaello Sanzio ovvero la sua amplificazione parossistica in forma di massa nelle regie di Einer Schleef. Nella dialettica tra questi due elementi si può leggere una condizione di antitesi oppure di sintesi, di contrasto o di dialogo all’interno di una comunità tra individuo e società. È per l’appunto nel superamento del conflitto proprio del moderno tra solo e coro che riconosciamo la cifra del teatro del XXI secolo: quando cioè l’io-solo non rappresenta più soltanto una persona ma può farsi unisono nel corpo a corpo con gli altri coreuti. Come nelle pratiche corali di Marco Martinelli e di molto teatro cosiddetto ‘di comunità’, la voce di uno si moltiplica nella voce di tutti gli altri, arrivando a con-fonderla e a con-fondersi in un insieme che è il ‘noi’ politico. Il ‘noi’ di una cittadinanza in cerca di voce e di azione.
Coro/Solo: una ricognizione storico-critica dal Novecento all'oggi
Silvia Mei
2024-01-01
Abstract
This contribution aims to trace, by a critical perspective, the historical evolution of the ways and forms in which the ‘solo’ and the ‘chorus’ have been expressed in theatre (both spoken and musical), dance, and performance from the 20th century to today. The historical discussion, organized here by themes and fields, highlights the particular dialectic triggered in some experimental periods by these two “luoghi-strumenti”, as Marco De Marinis aptly defines them, which have come to characterize specific theatrical genres, trends in both modern and contemporary theatre, as well as artistic, social, and community practices. Since the origins of Western theatre and dramaturgy, different logics have governed the relationship between chorus and solo, leading up to more radical contemporary reconsiderations, such as the removal of the chorus in the Attic tragedy directed by Socìetas Raffaello Sanzio, or its paroxysmal amplification in the form of a mass on the scene of Einar Schleef. In the dialectic between these two elements, we can discern a condition of confrontation or dialogue, of contrast or synthesis within a community, between the individual and society. It is precisely in the overcoming of the modern conflict between solo and chorus that we recognize the essence of contemporary theatre: when the ‘I’ no longer represents just an unrepeatable singularity but can become unison in close interaction with other choristers. As in the choral practices of Marco Martinelli and of much ‘community theatre’, the individual’s voice becomes the voice of all, blending into a collective whole, the political ‘we’ of a citizenship in search of action.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


