Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone 0.7 mg implants (DEX-I) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) either naive to therapy or refractory to anti-VEGF treatment, in a single-center, real-world setting. Methods: Patients diagnosed with DME and treated with DEX-I were retrospectively enrolled in the study and split in two groups: naive (Group 1, n = 64) and refractory (Group 2, n = 64) to treatment. Patients were evaluated at baseline, at 1 month, and every 3 months after each DEX-I implant. Main outcome measures were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to follow-up visits. Results: Significant improvements in BCVA were observed in treatment-naive patients at 6 months following the first and second DEX-I injection (p = 0.0023 and p = 0.0063, respectively), with significant reductions in mean CMT at 6 months after all DEX implants. In treatment-refractory patients, mean CMT was significantly reduced from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.05) after all DEX-I injections, although no changes were observed in BCVA. Conclusions: DEX-I improved visual acuity and macular edema mostly in treatment-naive patients, suggesting DEX-I may be a viable first-line treatment option in DME.
Early treatment with dexamethasone intravitreal implants in diabetic macular edema: Naïve versus refractory patients
Bux, Anna V;Fortunato, Francesca;Delle Noci, Nicola;Iaculli, Cristiana
2022-01-01
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone 0.7 mg implants (DEX-I) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) either naive to therapy or refractory to anti-VEGF treatment, in a single-center, real-world setting. Methods: Patients diagnosed with DME and treated with DEX-I were retrospectively enrolled in the study and split in two groups: naive (Group 1, n = 64) and refractory (Group 2, n = 64) to treatment. Patients were evaluated at baseline, at 1 month, and every 3 months after each DEX-I implant. Main outcome measures were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to follow-up visits. Results: Significant improvements in BCVA were observed in treatment-naive patients at 6 months following the first and second DEX-I injection (p = 0.0023 and p = 0.0063, respectively), with significant reductions in mean CMT at 6 months after all DEX implants. In treatment-refractory patients, mean CMT was significantly reduced from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.05) after all DEX-I injections, although no changes were observed in BCVA. Conclusions: DEX-I improved visual acuity and macular edema mostly in treatment-naive patients, suggesting DEX-I may be a viable first-line treatment option in DME.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.