The second Protocol to the Cybercrime Convention raises issues on its relationship with the EU regulation establishing the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). It could be implemented into the EPPO investigation tools by domestic law; nevertheless it needs to be coordinated with the relevant EU law provisions. Furthermore, a tricky issue rises from the EC Commission’s Proposal to authorize its conclusion: it invites Member States to ensure that the EPPO, in the exercise of its competences, can request cooperation under the Protocol in the same way as the national Prosecutors, with regard to articles 8 to 12, without mentioning, indeed, arts. 6 and 7.
Il Secondo Protocollo e le indagini della Procura europea
Procaccino, A.
2022-01-01
Abstract
The second Protocol to the Cybercrime Convention raises issues on its relationship with the EU regulation establishing the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). It could be implemented into the EPPO investigation tools by domestic law; nevertheless it needs to be coordinated with the relevant EU law provisions. Furthermore, a tricky issue rises from the EC Commission’s Proposal to authorize its conclusion: it invites Member States to ensure that the EPPO, in the exercise of its competences, can request cooperation under the Protocol in the same way as the national Prosecutors, with regard to articles 8 to 12, without mentioning, indeed, arts. 6 and 7.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
