Effects of strength and core stability training versus strength and aerobic training in subject aged over 65

Aim: The study aims to describe the effects of two different types of training aimed at people over 65: a workout based on strength and core stability versus a workout based on strength and aerobic controlled intensity activity. Methods: The study was conducted with active adults (n = 65, 31 males, 34 females) randomly divided into 2 groups: strength and core stability group (SCG, n = 33) with age, weight and height ( mean ± ds) respectively of 66.4 ± 1.9 years, 63.4 ± 2.8 kg, 169 ± 3.5 cm; strength and aerobic training group (SAG, n = 32) with age, weight and height of 66.2 ± 1.8 years, 64.1 ± 6.5 kg, 170 ± 3.2 cm respectively. The sample performed for 8 weeks (3 sessions a week) the two different training; before and after the training period (T0 and T1), the strength of the Core district, static balance ability, lower limb strength, and aerobic ability were evaluated. Results: The SCG showed statistically significant increases in the tests of Core strength (p <0.01), in monopodalic balance test on both limbs (p <0.001), in the lower limbs strength (p <0.01) and in aerobic ability (p <0.001); SAG showed significant increases only in the aerobic ability (p <0.05). The comparison between SCG and SAG showed significant differences in all T1 tests in the SCG. Conclusions: The subject over 65 effectively responds to the Core district loads with positive transfer and adaptation in other motor ability; it is plausible to assume that such content should be included in the motor activity plans aimed to increasing balance ability, trunk stabilization and, consequently, in senior fall prevention plans.