This paper takes the debate on the concept of law as a departure for redrafting the role of legal doctrine (Rechtsdogmatik). It distinguishes, in a quadral model, four categorically distinct concepts of law (convergent and divergent legal positivism, and convergent and divergent legal non-positivism), and – accordingly, four categorically distinct concepts of legal doctrine – or, rather, of the role of justice in legal doctrine. As a result, it can be shown that a moderated understanding of the argument from justice is compatible with (divergent) legal positivism.

La dogmatica giuridica al cospetto del giuspositivismo

Di Carlo, Leonardo
2026-01-01

Abstract

This paper takes the debate on the concept of law as a departure for redrafting the role of legal doctrine (Rechtsdogmatik). It distinguishes, in a quadral model, four categorically distinct concepts of law (convergent and divergent legal positivism, and convergent and divergent legal non-positivism), and – accordingly, four categorically distinct concepts of legal doctrine – or, rather, of the role of justice in legal doctrine. As a result, it can be shown that a moderated understanding of the argument from justice is compatible with (divergent) legal positivism.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11369/486032
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact